UK_Flag.jpg (8077 bytes) The Unofficial British Royal Family Pages

Home Current News Celebrations Discussions History
In Memoriam Columnists Profiles Speeches Succession
Links Pictures F.A.Q. Search For Sale/Wanted

bluedivider.gif (2754 bytes)

 

 mweatherfordlogo.jpg (5525 bytes)

Sunday 7 May 2006

The Royal Collection

The Royal Collection "includes paintings, drawings and watercolors, furniture, ceramics, clocks, silver, sculpture, jewelry, books, manuscripts, prints and maps, arms and armor, fans, and textiles" that the royal family has acquired over centuries, according to its web site at www.royalcollection.co.uk. Before the nineteenth century, "royal collection" usually meant specific collections such as Charles I's art collection or George III's collection of books rather than all of the valuable possessions of the Crown. George IV, followed by Victoria and Albert, were enthusiastic collectors, and they created the enormous, professionally administered collection that exists today. Elizabeth II's advisers have promoted the wider use of the term "Royal Collection" as a response to criticism of her vast wealth. The Queen does not own the Royal Collection - "it is held in trust by The Queen as Sovereign for her successors and the Nation" according to the web site - and removing it from the estimates of her wealth lowers the figure dramatically.

But not owning it does not mean that it is not hers. The Queen has the final say on all decisions relating to the collection, and the vast majority of it is in her homes, not on public display. The Royal Collection Trust administers the Royal Collection, but there has never been any gift of specific items to a formal trust. The Royal Collection Trust is a registered charity, but it appears to me that it is not actually a trust, and it does not own the items in the Royal Collection. Also, the computerized inventory of the Royal Collection is not available to the public, so it is unclear whether or not the Queen owns specific items in her possession. (For this and other insights I am indebted to a column titled "Buried Treasure," by Charlotte Higgins in the April 20, 2006 edition of The Guardian, available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/monarchy/story/0,,1757196,00.html.)

The Royal Collection has been significantly affected by the recent movement to make the monarchy more modern and professional. It became a department in the Royal Household in 1987 and a registered charity in 1993. It has adopted sophisticated modern techniques to care for delicate items that were too often knocked around by servants in the past. Works of art from the Royal Collection are much more visible than in the past, thanks to traveling exhibits, the remodeled Queen's Gallery and opening of the state rooms at Buckingham Palace, and the addition of an art gallery at the Palace of Holyroodhouse. The Royal Collection also has a web site with photographs and descriptions of many of the more important works.

The cost of the Royal Collection is now funded by the admission charges and gift shops at Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, and the Palace of Holyroodhouse. The Royal Collection Trust is now making money rather than only spending it. The new capitalistic attitude does not fit very well with the claim that the Royal Collection is in trust for the nation. Something can hardly be said to belong to the nation when the nation has to pay twenty-five pounds (the cost of adult admission to the state rooms, Queen's Gallery, and Royal Mews at Buckingham Palace) to see it, available July through September only. The National Gallery, the British Museum and the Victoria & Albert Museum are infinitely better deals, with free admission and far more art on display. The Royal Collection brags that its advantage over museums is that its artworks may be seen in "the historic settings for which they were originally commissioned or acquired." This is true in some cases, but most of the Royal Collection has moved around quite a lot.

The Royal Collection has over 7000 paintings, 350,000 photographs, 1400 sculptures, and 3000 miniatures, aside from the world-class collection of decorative arts and the best collection of drawings in the world. (Incidentally, Charlotte Higgins wrote that the Royal Collection has 500,000 prints, but their web site says 150,000.) The Royal Collection really is the national collection of art in Britain, purchased with government funds over centuries. The Queen may find that she has opened a Pandora's box by creating what are essentially private, for-profit art galleries to display only a small fraction of the enormous art collection that supposedly belongs to Britain, not to her. The Prince of Wales (who is head of the Royal Collection Trust) and Prince William are said to want to improve public access to the Royal Collection, perhaps by increasing the gallery space in Buckingham and Kensington Palaces. Hopefully future reigns will continue to bring greater access to the treasures of the Crown.

- Margaret Weatherford

Previous columns can be found in the archive

bluedivider.gif (2754 bytes)

This page and its contents are 2007 Copyright by Geraldine Voost and may not be reproduced without the authors permission. Margaret Weatherford's column is 2007 Copyright by Margaret Weatherford who has kindly given permission for it to be displayed on this website.
This page was last updated on: Sunday, 07-May-2006 21:41:37 CEST